The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided maps depict the information about an island before and after construction of tourists facilities. The data is caliberated in 100 metres.

It can be clearly seen that, before development of tourist facilities there was only trees and beach on the island. Whereas, after development reception and restaurant built in middle area of island. Along with this, trees are not cut down they all are on same place as before construction of facilities.

Furthermore, accommodation is built near the trees and footpath is made to connect other houses to walk safely. Moreover, pier is built and island have two boats to travel in the sea. Lastly, beach is developed more and swimming area provided on beach for enjoyment for tourists.

Overall, after construction of tourist facilities island changed significantly and many tourist attraction places were built on island.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facilities'' or 'facility's'?
Suggestion: facilities'; facility's
... Overall, after construction of tourist facilities island changed significantly and many t...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 744.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 139.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35251798561 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43363162301 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89274841199 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625899280576 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9269702788 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6666666667 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4444444444 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242952694422 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102910884438 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117779565384 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171783365449 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101188943633 0.0819641961636 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.