The picture compares a hospital city site in the years 2007 and 2010. Overall, a massive construction took place on the site, and many facilities were added and expanded.
In 2007, there were six stations alongside hospital Rd destroyed in 2010 and moved to a new place on the east side of the hospital road. In 2010, the capacity of parking space almost was doubled. Also, it is divided into two public and staff car parks. The public parking was located next to the city hospital. In contrast, the former car park was changed into the staff car park. Two round bouts also were constructed, one of which was established in the former intersection of city road and hospital Rd. The next roundabout was located in the conjunction of hospital Rd and ring road connected bus station and hospital Rd to staff parking and public car parks. The city hospital did not change too much and just experienced a change on the south side of the city hospital building due to the roundabout construction in 2010. However, it was still surrounded by the ring road.
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari
- the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 67
- Topic Nowadays people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might be the case What could be disadvantages of being self employed 38
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, still, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68108108108 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55203838665 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508108108108 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 69.1700079514 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280003959909 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116973610781 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969571852077 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209155517472 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452717537412 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.