The two maps below show roads access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps give some information about roads access to a hospital that it is situated in a city.
Firstly, we can see, there were six bus stops in Hospital Rd that people could have access to the hospital by them. Also, there was a parking area in the south-east of the hospital that people and hospital staffs could use it. This parking area located in the north-east of an intersection which connected hospital Rd to city road.
In following, in 2010 constructed a new car park area in the east of the hospital for public cars while another parking area assigned to hospital staffs' cars. The junction between the hospital and hospital Rd developed to a roundabout. Furthermore, the intersection which connected city road to hospital Rd changed to a roundabout. Moreover, the bus stops were destroyed and a bus station was built between two new roundabouts.
To sum up, access to the hospital changed to better. It is easier for people to have access to the hospital with their personal cars or with the bus.
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The last two decades have seen enormous changes in the way people’s lives are affected by IT, with manyadvances in this field. However, while these technological advances have brought many benefits to the world,it can be argued that these developments i 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 56
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, so, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77966101695 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69035727733 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7970928595 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.6 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198718245591 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098573883038 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588745313117 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153442912067 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619413412469 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.