The pie graphs illustrate the percentage of six different employment trends separated by genders in the UK in 1992.
Overall, Clerical or related occupation was the most sizable area on the female pattern meanwhile Managerial and professional occupation covered majority of the portion of the male occupation data. The general labourers was a tiny fraction in both genders.
Looking firstly at the female chart, about one-third (at 31 %) of the total area, being Clerical or related occupation, was greater than the male data of the same occupation by over 20 %. The second and the third highest was Managerial and professional; other manual occupation at 29 % and 27 % respectively. The other areas were insignificant which were accounted for below 10 %.
Turning to the male data, the highest percentage was the managerial and professional career (at 36 %), leaving other manual occupation behind by approximately 10 %. The craft or similar occupation was recorded at 24 % which was four fold higher than Clerical or related; and other non-manual occupation: both share at 6 %. Finally, covered only 2.5, general labourers job was the lowest percentage.
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compariso 11
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.Employees and self-employed: by sex and occupation, 1992 11
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 73
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- In countries where unemployment is high, education should only be obligatory up to primary school and not secondary school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t which were accounted for below 10 %. Turning to the male data, the highest pe...
^^^
Line 7, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...abourers job was the lowest percentage.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41111111111 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01829476701 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594444444444 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5134574686 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0505914775661 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250410275915 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368504500444 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0464199429278 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448228078746 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.