The diagram showcases the process of recycling aluminum tins with sufficient illustrations.
In general, there are 6 types of operations and the main method involves 2nd figure because everything relies fully on this mechanism.
Firstly, ordinary individuals should gather accurately the aluminum containers into the special container. Then, the second process involves cleaning, sorting, shredding, and compression. These all figures are performed by cutting-edge machines. Thereon, compressed canisters are heated by certain workers in a big oven. Thereafter, the heated cans are rolled by specific technologies and the thickness of them should be between 2.5 mm and 6 mm.
Next, available rolls are reprocessed totally and this fifth level should be done thoroughly because of detecting useless and preliminary plastics and if there are some problems, the recycling device has to be ceased. Finally, tons of reusing cans are ready for selling and the proportion of recycled receptacles is 74 % in the United Kingdom.
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 73
- The Chart Below shows the milk export figures from three European countries between 2008 and 2012 Task 1 essay a barchat 87
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- Many doctors recommend that older people exercise regularly but most patients do not follow an exercise routine Why do you think this happens How can people be encouraged to exercise regularly 61
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, so, then, as to, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67532467532 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01198438707 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.707792207792 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4622186681 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1111111111 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0860078407614 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327124760475 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035543059527 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0516998682493 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366683677272 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.06136585366 129% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.