The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph give information about average carbon dioxide emitted per person in four different countries from 1967 to 2007. Units are measured in metric tonnes.

Overall, Sweden and United Kingdom saw a decreasing trend. Whereas, Portugal and Italy rose significantly thoughout the period.

From the graph, it is obvious that United Kingdom was the most carbon dioxide emitted country which stood about 11 metric tonnes in 1967. However, the number decreased steadily to about 9 metric tonnes during the 40 years. Turning to Sweden's emissions of carbon dioxide, just under 9 metric tonnes were released before reaching a peak in next decades, which was nearly 11 metric tonnes. Though, the trend decreased significantly to just under 6 metric tonnes.

In contrast, Italy emitted just over 4 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide in 1967 and Portugal was the least carbon dioxide emitted, accounting for 1.5 metric tonnes in the corresponding year. Nevertheless, both of these countries saw a dramatical growth to 7.5 and 5.5 metric tonnes respectively until 2007. Taking into consideration, Portugal and Sweden had a same amount of emissions (5.5) in 2007.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...des, which was nearly 11 metric tonnes. Though, the trend decreased significantly to j...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, whereas, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 26.3917525773 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 937.175257732 104% => OK
No of words: 183.0 206.0 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31693989071 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67597809958 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568306010929 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 290.88556701 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5686396064 44.8134815571 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4545454545 76.5299724578 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 16.8248392259 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 4.34317383033 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211647691555 0.216113520407 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896294342693 0.0766984524023 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760711789535 0.0603063233224 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159360159262 0.12726935374 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716469178461 0.0580467560999 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 8.37731958763 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 70.7449484536 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 8.71597938144 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 41.2886597938 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 8.62886597938 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.