The given line graph illustrates the mean emission of carbon dioxide per individual from 1967 to 2007 in four European countries.
Overall, it is clear that the highest amount of carbon dioxide emission occurred in the United Kingdom throughout the entire period, while, the least was in Portugal.
Moving on to the details, in 1967, 11 metric tons of CO2 were emitted in the United Kingdom, which then showed a slow but steady fall and ended at the rate of 9 metric tons in 2007. However in Sweden, the initial decade exhibited an increase from 8 to 9 metric tons, dropped to the lowest of 5 metric tons in the final year.
In contrast, both Italy and Portugal experienced an upward trend in the rate of carbon dioxide emission. Initially it was about 1.5 for Portugal and 4.5 for Italy and then rose to the peak of 5.5 and 7.5 metric tons respectively.
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people claim that not enough of wastes from homes is recycled. They say that that only way to increase recycling for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Many governments think that economic progress is most important goal. some people, however, think that other types of progress and equally important for a country. 56
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...d at the rate of 9 metric tons in 2007. However in Sweden, the initial decade exhibited...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 26.3917525773 106% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 705.0 937.175257732 75% => OK
No of words: 153.0 206.0 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60784313725 4.54256449028 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.78020617076 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43548040082 2.54303337028 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 127.690721649 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.622605031667 99% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 290.88556701 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.9101009904 44.8134815571 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.5 76.5299724578 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 16.8248392259 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 4.34317383033 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207577921495 0.216113520407 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100998295679 0.0766984524023 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566562288108 0.0603063233224 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125894225094 0.12726935374 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455535877701 0.0580467560999 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 8.37731958763 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 8.71597938144 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 7.59969072165 118% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.