The given graph depicts the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission per person, between the years 1967 and 2007 for 4 countries viz. the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal.
Based on the information provided, the carbon dioxide emission per person in Sweden went up from a little over 8 metric tons in 1967 to a little over 10 metric tons in 1977. However, post this rise in the first decade, it has consistently tapered down during the subsequent 3 decades. Coming down to under 8 in 1987, further coming down to about 6 in 1997 and finally under 6 in 2007.
On the contrary, Italy and Portugal have seen a persistent rise for the entire duration of 4 decades. The carbon dioxide emission rose from about 4 to almost 8 for Italy, whereas, it rose from under 2 to almost 6 for Portugal. The United Kingdom, on the other hand, observed a consistent gradual decrease of the emission per person. During these 4 decades, the emission came down from over 10 to over 8 for the United Kingdom.
In a nutshell, the United Kingdom has been the best performer by persistently bringing down the emissions. Portugal also has been a good performer by keeping the emissions comparatively lower, though it demonstrated an upward trend.
- The internet has greatly increased our access to information To what extent do you think this is a good thing Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- You have decided to leave your current job and look for a new one Write a letter to a friend In your letter explain why you want to leave your current job describe what kind of job you are looking for ask for some help or advice 87
- You recently traveled on the local bus service in your town You think the driver drove badly and was rude to the passengers Write a letter to the manager of the local bus service In your letter introduce yourself and say when the incident happened describ 81
- Some high schools have a requirement that students must complete a certain amount of volunteer work in order to graduate What do you think about this type of requirement Give details to support your opinion 56
- What will a typical day be like in 2050 94
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, so, whereas, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.48453608247 27% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 26.3917525773 159% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 937.175257732 109% => OK
No of words: 214.0 206.0 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77102803738 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62056224752 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 127.690721649 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523364485981 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 290.88556701 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7459662999 44.8134815571 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8181818182 76.5299724578 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 16.8248392259 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 4.34317383033 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241349156512 0.216113520407 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924488911774 0.0766984524023 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912919527397 0.0603063233224 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16642147667 0.12726935374 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114525919833 0.0580467560999 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 8.37731958763 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 70.7449484536 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 8.71597938144 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 41.2886597938 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.