The graph illustrates the percentage of visitors to four different sights in Scotland: aquarium, castle, zoo, festival between 1980 and 2000. Overall, zoo and castle experienced a considerable increase in the percentage of guests, while the one of aquarium and festival decreased significantly. Moreover, it can be seen that castle was the highest line whereas zoo was the lowest. In 1980, castle began at the second place the rose substantially, reached the highest point in 1995, accounted for nearly 45%. However it soon declined about 10% and ended at over 30%. On the other hand, zoo, which was the least attractive at the beginning, approximately 10%, fluctuated gradually before witnessing a rapid growth in 2010. Aquarium was volatile over the period of ten years from 1980 to 1990 but later decreased steeply by above 10% specifically, became the attraction that had the lowest percentage of tourists. Festival, starting as the most popular place of interest, totally went down during the time shown.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart illustrates average CO2 emissions per person in four European countries between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph illustrates the percentage of ...
^^^
Line 1, column 512, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...oint in 1995, accounted for nearly 45%. However it soon declined about 10% and ended at...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 26.3917525773 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 937.175257732 90% => OK
No of words: 162.0 206.0 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23456790123 4.54256449028 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.78020617076 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85567057675 2.54303337028 112% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 127.690721649 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.685185185185 0.622605031667 110% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 290.88556701 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.1177953033 44.8134815571 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 76.5299724578 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 16.8248392259 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 4.34317383033 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.29896907216 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0846247728026 0.216113520407 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360576825516 0.0766984524023 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488041313339 0.0603063233224 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846247728026 0.12726935374 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0580467560999 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 8.37731958763 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 70.7449484536 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 8.71597938144 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 41.2886597938 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.