Creative artists should always be given freedom to express their own ideas (in words, picture, music, film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do.To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is certainly true that art has enriched human emotions for a long time. Humans have a long history with artworks in term of expressed human’s mind or presented humans’ perspective. Therefore, the freedom of expression is very important to an art producer. Some people think that the expression of an artist should not be restricted by the government, while some argue that some regulations can help to control an artist to not produce appropriate artwork. Personally, I do agree with this statement for a number of reasons.
Firstly, art is a very important symbol of culture. Humans have used art to present their ideas to others. Art represents taste, richness and traditions of people in a society which can transmit the value to other societies or later generations. Those artworks such as literature, sculptures or paintings are all produced from human creativity. If other matters limit the freedom of expression, it will difficult for art makers to illustrate their perspective to other people.
Secondly, the beauty of art is overestimated. Art has many merits to human beings. Artwork can flourish our society. Artwork can enrich people mind and present different perspective to a wide audience. The creativity of artists always comes from deep into artists’ mind which is hard to control from other features. With some pressure from the government, it can scope an artist’s perspective and aspects to their capability in artwork.
Thirdly, the creativity of a painting or a literate requires the idea in an artist’s though which is very difficult to produce. As well as music producers can find wonderful beats from all nature such as bird’s singing, waves roaring or wind blowing. Works of art also need the freedom of thinking perhaps with the government restrictions its can be destroyed.
In conclusion, limiting an artist expression disturbs the process of thinking an artist. Any type of pressure or restrictions should not be used by the city. Art producers should be able to present their ideas freely in order to enrich the culture of human beings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-06-11 | pratik_dkr1 | 28 | view |
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past 30 years in the world that many cities now are "one big traffic jam". Do you think that this statement is true? What measure can government take to address this problem?
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages for a student of doing a degree at a local college or a university in the capital city Choose at least three factors to compare e g cost flexibility quality of qualification 70
- When people move to another country, some of them decide to follow the customs of the new country. Others prefer to keep their own customs. Compare these two choices. Which one do you prefer? Support your answer with specific details. 73
- The chart illustrates housing preferences among people who lived in the British cities of London, Oxford and Cambridge in the year 2005. 70
- It is generally believed that the Internet is an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not be the best place to find information Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 62
Sentence: If other matters limit the freedom of expression, it will difficult for art makers to illustrate their perspective to other people.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by an adjective
Suggestion: Refer to will and difficult
Sentence: Artwork can enrich people mind and present different perspective to a wide audience.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to people and mind
its can be destroyed.
it can be destroyed.
the process of thinking an artist.
the process of thinking by an artist.
the process of thinking of an artist.
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.455 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 340 350
No. of Characters: 1691 1500
No. of Different Words: 173 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.294 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.974 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.727 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 129 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 100 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 68 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.455 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.294 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.297 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.494 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.056 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5