Some people think that using animal for experimentation purpose is necessary for the development of science. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there is growing concern with regard to using animal in laboratory. While it is argued by many people that using animal for experimentation is critical for the advancement of science, others think that it is cruel and thus unacceptable. Overall, it is my personal view that, either human or animals are living creatures and are able to feel sense of pain, hence animals shouldn’t used for human’s sake.
First of all, pain is an intrinsic evil, and any action that causes pain to another creature is simply not morally permissible. Animals do in fact suffer, and do in fact feel pain. The researcher who forces rats to choose between electric shocks and starvation to see if they develop ulcers does so because he or she knows that rats have nervous systems much like humans and the feel the pain of shocks in a similar way. Pain is an intrinsic evil whether it is experienced by a child, an adult, or an animal. Human and animals are both living creatures on Earth, and animals should shared equal right to live as human. Hence, if it is wrong inflict pain on a human being, it is just wrong to inflict pain on an animal.
Secondly, animal welfare activists defend their position by countering the claim that halting painful animal experiments would put an end to scientific progress, with harmful consequences to society. Much animal experimentation, they say, is performed out of mere curiosity and has merit or no scientific merit. Animals are starved, shocked, burned, and poisoned as scientists look for something that just might yield some human benefit. In one case, baby mice had their legs chopped off so that experimenters could observe whether they’d learn to groom themselves with their stumps. In another, polar bears were submerged in a tank of crude oil and salt water to see if they would live. And, for those experiments which do have merit, there exist many non-animal alternatives. It is only out of sheer habit or ease that scientists continue to inflict pain on animals when, in fact, alternatives exist. And, where alternatives don’t exist, the moral task of science is to discover them.
By ways of conclusion, although animal testing is critical to the development of science, scientists should seek alternatives as opposed to animal experimentation to reduce pain on animals.
- People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live in a new country. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 98
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth What are solutions for these problems 84
- Some people believe that success in life depends on hard work and determination while others believe that other factors like money and personal appearance are important Discuss both views and give your opinion 68
- In some countries more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
there is growing concern
there is a growing concern
if they develop ulcers does so because he or she knows that rats have nervous systems much like humans and the feel the pain of shocks in a similar way.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
if it is wrong inflict pain on a human being
if it is wrong to inflict pain on a human being
Sentence: Human and animals are both living creatures on Earth, and animals should shared equal right to live as human.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to should and shared
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 395 350
No. of Characters: 1877 1500
No. of Different Words: 214 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.458 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.752 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.654 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 125 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 91 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.944 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.605 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.316 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.485 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.076 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5