Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In recent times, courtesy of the advancements and developments of technology, the world has become more digitally integrated. As a result, the prevalence of employees finishing up their tasks at home, or students catching up with their school works by using a host of digital platforms has exponentially increased. Notwithstanding potential problems lurking beneath this phenomenon, I am in favor of the view that its downsides have been eclipsed by positive facets, which will be further elucidated in this essay.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that this notion could prospectively lead to job reduction. To exemplify, even though technology has gained significant ubiquity at workplaces, numerous employees are still not digitally well-adapted. Therefore, if they do not strive to catch up with the dynamic movements of technology, organizations may have to fire them to employ others with the right skills. In terms of education, technology may discourage creativity. As students are exposed to a plethora of websites, they may easily find the answer when the question comes up. By shedding light on these examples, it is crystal clear that technological development may be detrimental to people of different age groups.
On the other hand, it is highly probable that the productivity of workers will be enhanced with the help of technological gadgets. To specify, in the past, most of the employees' time management tools were likely to be calendars or agenda notebooks, which may have limited functions and flexibilities; however, nowadays, productivity-oriented applications have been developed to help individuals to maintain their work-life balance, and keep track with deadlines and important tasks. Moreover, regarding technological adaptation in education, it is true that children may achieve better study performance by virtue of digitization. To cite an example, educational platforms like Skillshare or Coursera allow youngsters to attain a reservoir of knowledge with a plethora of videos of different skills and spheres. Hence, students will be able to study at their own speed and have a convivial community to share their thoughts and feelings and learn from others.
In conclusion, although technological integration can be disadvantageous for the potentials of job redundancy, I believe that its benefits have outweighed the drawbacks it brings with applications that act as virtue assistances of employees or several websites dedicating to deliver knowledgeable lessons for children. It can be anticipated that technological adaptation in daily life will continue to grow in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | Nguyen144202 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | oanh2020 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | maidiem.1508 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | thanhbinh | 61 | view |
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 78
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 78
- The maps below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now 78
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table shows the obesity rate in one country over a period of time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2222.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56892230576 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37287865929 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591478696742 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.0198189254 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.875 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9375 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133922347709 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425764167068 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360278516165 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783311679532 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039879294863 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.