A ban on all forms of advertising is beneficial to society because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?
With the development of advanced technology, advertisements have become widespread and appear everywhere. Although many people argued that a prohibition of advertising in all forms brings about great value for societies and countries, I completely disagree with this point of view.
On the one hand, strict punishments for ads can bring certainly help humans. The first reason relates to the reduction of consumers' expenditure on shopping. This is because they do not pay a great measure of money for products advertised which is not necessary and useful. Moreover, the government can eliminate unethical business advertisements such as cigarettes and alcoholic drinks which lead to the misperception about the function of these items, especially children who are unaware of the purpose of advertising is to increase sales. Individuals may select their items to fulfill their requirements without being adversely affected by the messages in which the truths related to these goods can have been exaggerated or even distorted.
On the other hand, I believe that we should not ban all forms of advertisement for various reasons. Firstly, advertising boosts the economy of a country by generating revenue, increasing sales, and contributing taxes to the government. As a result, the economy improves swiftly and can compete strongly with both domestic and foreign economies. In addition, it can deal with the problems of unemployment by providing jobs relating to the array of ideas, or designs. Therefore, they can have a higher standard of living when they can meet all their needs, and have the ability to purchase goods that contribute to economic development.
In conclusion, while punishments can help to prevent unethical advertisements in our lives, I still believe that it is a vital catalyst for growth in the modern world. Advertisements should be regulated but not eliminated entirely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-12 | anhduonggnee.e | view | |
| 2023-08-18 | tdat2709 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | giaminhonha | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
- 14 7 2016 Every day millions tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is hapenning And how can we solve this problem 67
- Many people have a close relationship with their pets These people treat their birds cats or other animals as members of their family In your opinion as such relationships good Why or Why not 84
- 01 08 2015 The world natural resorces are being consumed at an ever increased rate What are the dangers of this situation What should we do 61
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles 61
- The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use In order to reverse this decline in quality of life in cities attempts must be made to e 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41891891892 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10652133408 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608108108108 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.00642441 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227936997045 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705239586714 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437932011349 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128976909021 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166315118785 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.