Because of the busy pace of modern life, many children spend most of their time indoors and have little exposure to the natural world. Discuss the effects lack of experience with and understanding of nature can have on children as they grow up.

In the presence of children’s significant time indoors, they scarcely enjoy fresh air in greenery. This phenomenon has led to uprise of terrifying effects on growing kids. In the essay, I will describe the impacts on them.

Opting in-house activities have a direct and indirect drawback in their development. The detrimental impact on children in getting to workplace. Most often, acquiring little knowhow in the process of workplace with limited communication. The way which getting used to work is hindered and with inadequate experience to work, they will be regarded as incapable and unproductive to survive in nature.

Another negative effect on children is that they might find hard to communicate with others. They may fear their words will be twisted for they have isolated from society from a long while, learnt little about interpersonal relationships and how one should be got along. Communicating with friends in the internet with lack of face-to-face conversations, they fail to look into people’s true character. That has a severe hazardous impact on them who might be addicted to pornography and violence in video games and TV. They either fear in looking into others’ eyes or hurting others’ feelings in speeches. All these cause them shut down and become isolated in society.

In summary, children who get in touch with the outside world is something should not be neglected. Thus, I believe children should not stay long indoors as negative effects on them can be disastrous, in terms of future working as well as social barrier.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, in summary, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27380952381 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99460704063 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626984126984 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0776962008 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23036462484 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705711513764 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443298255284 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136384685544 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163946012688 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.