Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think are consumers influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them?

It is often argued that media promotions nowadays are largely affecting customers’ decision in purchasing products. Despite the companies have the right in making advertisements to the public, I certainly agree that people’s way of thinking is changed by the media ads. I will the reason why I agree with the view and steps to be taken in protection of consumers.

Although the current advertisement firms have to sale their products to persuade others to buy it, it is in no doubt that as a consumer who are considering whether to obtain the product is hugely due to the way how the service attracts them. When they find the advertisement is reliable and renowned in a way, the deal is seen as successful. Another reason is that most commercial institution has their unique selling feature which wins public recognision and support as a means to gain a profit for the business advantage. Finally, it is the purchaser who suffers a loss when they discover the commodity comes beyond their expectation of outcome. Many others just put aside their purchased goods or even come up with complaints or criticism towards the organizations in charge, which is regarded as unfavourable to both parties.

measures-> gov set up public promotion->raise awareness indi selection-> since consumers right to decide before buying; education – wise manner financial management

However, steps could be taken into consideration to alleviate the problem. One could be setting up propagandas to raise the public awareness on individual consumption. Everyone should be stressed to have independent selection on products they are willing to buy. As buyers acquire the right to make a wise decision before purchasing. Another way is that public education to students by teaching them a proper value on financial management which cultivates them a wisely manner by the wave of advertisement selling in all cost. It is appropriate to let students who grow up with the correct way of decision making of consumption coming from various channels.

In summary, it is clear that consumerism looks dire without a wise choice in goods selection. Therefore, I would not recommend the way advertisements selling which distorts public value and steps should be taken into consideration.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Measures
...ed as unfavourable to both parties. measures-> gov set up public promotion->raise aw...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on on products they are willing to buy. As buyers acquire the right to make a wise...
^^
Line 7, column 462, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('wisely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('manner') instead of another adjective.
...ancial management which cultivates them a wisely manner by the wave of advertisement selling in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, look, so, therefore, as to, in summary, no doubt

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24383561644 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10156347718 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561643835616 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2135040004 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154569224902 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478632292507 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424420977506 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858947684403 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173380497114 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.