Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Is it a positive or negative development

These days, there is a marked similarity between many countries since the same commodities are sold worldwide. I believe this is a negative development, which is as a result of globalisation and reduced travelling rates.

The reasons why nations have become similar are many and varied. First, the integration of different countries of the world had brought about economic migration. One obvious reason for this is that most large-scale industries have relocated to countries that are beneficial to them economically. They not only pay low taxes but also have easy access to an adequate power supply and cheap labour. As a result of this, employers pay their local workers' negligible wages compared to their work input. The production and assembling of the popular apple product in China are a good illustration of this. Also, owing to the cooperation and collaboration between developed and developing countries, in reducing the import duties on the products typically purchased, similar goods can be bought everywhere in the world.

In addition, aside from the negative effect of globalisation, the travel and tourism industry is severely affected. This is because people do not need to travel to invest in foreign commodities as long as they can easily be bought in their native countries. Take high-priced goods such as Chanel and Louis Vuitton, for example, world travellers typically go to Paris to purchase these luxury items. However, since they are being sold locally, travelling will be almost always unnecessary. Consequently, more established airlines are being forced to fold-up because there is a marked reduction in the number of tourists.

In conclusion, selling the same goods both locally and abroad has many drawbacks, which can bring about extortion on local employees and the disappearance of some businesses.

Votes
Average: 3.9 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38062283737 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94906331123 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615916955017 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2133812949 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193977063704 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564766370079 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043975724871 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955866769206 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437376202615 0.056905535591 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.