In today’s high speed technology gears and among different available social instruments allowing to this freedom for special group of people can be destructive as well as being constructive for both people and government. I have agreements and disagreements with this topic.
At first, every person has their own ideas in every aspect of his/her life. In this case, we have artists. An artist sees the world by his/ her own perspective, and sometimes. Some radical movements in society have effects on some of them. Artists have their loyal fans that always follow their interactions in society. Willingly or unwillingly, there are fans that awe their popular artists and obey them rather than their family members. For example, i remember in one presidential elections, some artists had followed a political person, and he had become a trend in all social media. The majority of people had chosen this person in election at that time without having knowledge about him and only because of their favorite artists confirmation. After selecting him as a president, country had failed in its alien politics and more and more sanctions have been come by other countries and the government and of course people had disabled in many aspects of their life. However, after years these artists one by one apologized to people. Therefore, i have never been optimistic about artist political movement in society because always there are benefits only for them and not for ordinary people.
By contrast, artists should not dictate their opinions to people. Without considering some mistakes from some of them, artists have fine and fragile spirits. They know the cruel of governments against people and live beside people. Sometimes, by a painting or by sharing a poetry on their social media channels they are able to heal the people old wounds. Sometimes, by informing people about horrible problems, make people union and give a wide perspective for their future life. They are always worried about climate changes, and i see various artists encourage people clearly to help each other to make planet more habitable for their future generations.
All in all, expressing ideas freely, by an artist have a heavy responsibility, and sometimes, it is very destructive and has disasters, and of course sometimes it will be very constructive and will help people to have comfortable life by inspiring from their creative and open minded artists.
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
- Your neighbors have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your houseflat Write a letter to your neighbors In your letterExplain the reasons for the noise ApologizeDescribe what action you will take 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should be only allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 56
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...than their family members. For example, i remember in one presidential elections,...
^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ways worried about climate changes, and i see various artists encourage people cl...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, of course, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18434343434 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71862053485 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537878787879 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9546674997 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.65 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160296528877 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553839501663 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328373127281 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102852847789 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128870119307 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.