Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before?
Yes, I do accept that new technology has given many individuals more spare time than ever before. However, it is important to have gadgets for other purposes but since the technology has been developed extremely to help us work quickly in the everyday tasks from online shopping to searching for any possible things on social media and made a tremendous impact on people of all ages. People are likely to use more time on their phones and laptops than in past generations. Many technologies have changed over time and this made many adolescents focused on what the modern world would like to call "The Internet".
Internet was built for people to socialize and be connected with their loved ones easily and get to listen to different types of music, as well as, TV shows, news, online shopping applications and much more. In addition, many people are been unsystematic with their work issues and school homework, nonetheless, many teenagers are facing serious consequences in their social networks. For instance, many youngsters are uploading bizarre challenges that are dangerous for children and elders, on the other hand, having various videos online makes children get used to technologies rather than reading actual books. People are suffering and are addictive with their gadgets and possibly becoming a couch potato.
In conclusion, having leisure time can make people relax and stress-free, but its hard to deny that human being is so depended on technologies than before.
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before? 56
- Many people nowadays travel aboard for their university education Why do people do this and will you consider doing this yourself 58
- the pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years. 56
- The table below shows the information and prediction regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 51
- The table below gives information on UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nonetheless, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18220338983 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69007066415 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639830508475 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7732340281 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.888888889 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4444444444 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204704753664 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935799546995 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917867303031 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148553307515 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864619232958 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.