Many people argue that the opportunity to attend tertiary education is equal for every individual and it is advisable for the government to provide free education for all students irrespective of their financial capacity. While this suggestion will be beneficial for students coming from low-income families and the society as a whole, I maintain that it will put a heavier burden on the national budget and negatively affect students' attitudes towards studying.
On the one hand, the idea of supplying free higher education is reasonable to some extent. First and foremost, an exemption to tuition fees means that people from lower socioeconomic backgrounds can have a chance to pursue university. As the price of taking a course at university is relatively costly nowadays, many impoverished students can not afford these costs and they have to drop out of schools to begin their working life. Therefore, with the financial support from the government, these students can continue their studying and secure a number of well-paid jobs after graduating from university. Moreover, at the state level, society will benefit from a higher level of civilized citizens.
On the other hand, there are a number of reasons why the provision of free university’s fees will have a negative influence on the state budget and students’ learning attitude. The first reason is that in order to supply education without charge for every individual, it requires a huge amount of money. As a result, it will put a strain on the national fund and a variety of essential aspects that are in need of government’s investment will be delayed. The second reason involves the degradation in students’ determination towards their studying. This is because it costs students nothing to retake a failed subject at university; they will take it for granted and do not pay attention to academic outcomes.
In conclusion, although the exemption of university learning costs regardless of students’ financial conditions will do wonders for disadvantaged students as well as facilitate a more civilized community, I contend that the problems resulting from this phenomenon should also not be ignored. In my view, it is a better option for the government to have a policy to financially support university students according to their financial circumstances.
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country 73
- The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce fertiliser compost Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Essay 6 Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants why do you think people waste food what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32345013477 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05021508928 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517520215633 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.302390568 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.071428571 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244814062215 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880171383426 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616385988741 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160777511057 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296944472758 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.