Language cannot be ignored in human evolution. It is often said that language disappearing is a positive procedure since it strucks the language barrier over the world. I completely disagree with this statement and I believe that there are several negative meanings for the phenomenon.
To begin with, language is a critical component of cultural meaning. We may always discover that the Hong Kong protesters are protecting Cantonese, which is the original language in Hong Kong, as soon as the government is going to promote Putonghua to be the new formal language instead of Cantonese in Hong Kong. The reason for the forceful objection is that the local culture such as Cantonese music or ritual will vanish if the original language is abolished. Therefore, the influences of the local culture are serious by the language disappearing.
Language is also represented as a certification part of a country. The strongest example would be the evidence that the formal languages of each existing country are also different, for instance, Korean, Japan and France own their self-language separately. The significance is that the establishment of an own language is necessary for a certificated country, nowadays, we would not see that the official language of a country comes from other countries. Thus, as long as there is a death of a language, a country will be invaded as well as disappeared by others clearly.
In conclusion, because of the disadvantages, like the vanished of typical culture as well as the existence of a country, are outweighing the positive consequences, I believe that the circumstance of language disappearing is vital for the public or even the world.
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 56
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wish. Other people believe that it is importa 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18382352941 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11985736022 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9123209244 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235837568959 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962728123396 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295398818101 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148539798131 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606233831298 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.