No one will purchase hard form of newspaper and books because in this modern world technology provide you opportunity to read books and newspaper through online without paying. I totally disagree the above statements that printed newspaper and books will not be bought in the future. I know that technology give you amenities to read the books and article online from different website but it doesn’t give you full access to read the whole latest news.
On the one hand, many people like to hold a newspaper or books as a physical through which they feel to read more comfortable. Some people feel inconvenience when they read any articles from online. For instance, anyone who read newspaper via online they face a lot of problems firstly, the brightness of screen is irritate to understand the articles and book and a lot of people cannot spend much time in front of screen. Secondly, some online site do not allow to access and read the whole books and newspaper because the owner of the site want some benefits from online readers likewise, subscription and sign up.
Once the people subscribe and sign up after that they get lots of notification and advertisements during reading the books so this all things make disturbance to read articles from online. Moreover, people prefer to read a printed book to enhance a reading skills.
In conclude, I strongly disagree that people will no longer to pay for printed newspaper or books. Despite, read everything free through online it’s totally precisely flawed.
- the table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university 67
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History Discuss both view and give opinion 61
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
- Radio and Television Audiences in UK October December 1992 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99215686275 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58426314331 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3489562756 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.727272727 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370771066583 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152628516346 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633413995531 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227324208751 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655811739199 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.