Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The industrial revolution has resulted in the urge for development in certain areas, including transportation. Such a field is required to improve in order to facilitate trading as well as citizens’ commute. Regarding that, a question arises as to whether government shall concentrate on upgrading the railway system instead of the roadway. In my point of view, it is necessary to focus on building a sustainable railroad.
In comparison to railroads, roadways are more economical to maintain since they can be taxed through toll gates. Government can also employ such taxation to generate a nation venue. Besides, commuters can customize their experience with a variety of choices of vehicles, ranging from the bus and taxis to private transportation like bikes, motorcycles, or cars. Additionally, they are more active in controlling time, speed, and destination’s stoppages throughout the journeys. For example, when traveling in a domestic car, families can easily slow down and stop by stations or beautiful sceneries.
Although the maintenance of trains is more costly, these means of transportation are beneficial for several reasons. Firstly, trains are faster than some road vehicles. It is published that a train can speed up to 100km/h. Secondly, trains can carry more cargo and passengers, which is more suitable for long-distance journeys. Therefore, it is actually cheaper than some road transportation. Thirdly, in certain aspects, the traffic systems of railroads help avoid collisions and ensure safety. Finally, if money were spent on railways, the number of vehicles on road would decrease, further avoiding crew and detrimental road accidents.
In conclusion, I concur with the idea that authorities should allocate money to railways due to all the reasons listed above. Commuting by train is far more efficient and inexpensive for civilians.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000, and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Newspapers have an enormous influence on people’s ideas and opinions. Why? Is this a positive or negative situation? 78
- The graphs below show information about citizenship in the UK 62
- The chart below shows what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...mute. Regarding that, a question arises as to whether government shall concentrate on upgradi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 600, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...top by stations or beautiful sceneries. Although the maintenance of trains is mo...
^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...e maintenance of trains is more costly, these means of transportation are beneficial for se...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, finally, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51567944251 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1499915161 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662020905923 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4229380775 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9444444444 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9444444444 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112445160171 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331818673017 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479573458197 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068285651544 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361373656344 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.