How should the government act against eco-terrorism and climate change
The civil government should have a saying in the protection of forest because the composition of forest in a given country represents the nature and the civilization of that said country. For example, in our country the forests are being destroyed by some unknown terrorists and third parties in order to create land for construction projects. Although it may be argued that the revenue created by these construction projects help cultivate new and better (by better I mean ecologically as CO2 produced per hectare) forests.
These assumptions are however near sighted and wrong because when one destroys a forest it also destroys a vast range of animals and fungi that live and thrive in that ecosystem.
Therefore we urge the civil government to take lead in the fight against these eco-terrorists by declaring some parts of the country free from any human intervention. Anyone who opposes or lobbies against these acts should be declared enemies of state.
Secondly we urge the government to create vertical forests in urban centers in order to create a healthier and safer air for the citizens. These vertical forests should be composed of skyscrapers filled with highly efficient photosynthesers. Instead of this the government can also create state of the art vertical farms amidst the cities. These will both cleanse the air and create fresh food for consumption in the cities. They will also provide the citizens with jobs, that’s also an end in itself.
Thirdly, the government should also create task forces to cultivate new forests around the countryside to help combat against the effects of climate change. These task forces should be around 150-200 people. They should also take care of any sick animals around the said countryside and help educate the populace about the newer and better farming techniques.
Furthermore I would also like to state that climate action is a form of national preservation because earth is our only home on this interestingly vast universe.
- Are the benefits of mass tourism greater than the problems that it causes Why or why not 56
- Are the benefits of mass tourism greater than the problems that it causes Why or why not 56
- Are the benefits of mass tourism greater than the problems that it causes Why or why not 86
- The Social and Psychological Reasons of Food Waste 67
- The Social and Psychological Reasons of Food Waste 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 400, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this construction' or 'these constructions'?
Suggestion: this construction; these constructions
...y be argued that the revenue created by these construction projects help cultivate new and better ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...at live and thrive in that ecosystem. Therefore we urge the civil government to take le...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cultivating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: cultivating
...vernment should also create task forces to cultivate new forests around the countryside to h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... newer and better farming techniques. Furthermore I would also like to state that climate...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, for example, i mean
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74242767293 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533950617284 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4428504645 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156648828923 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567328252511 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595405090537 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802733263555 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695505596921 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.