Human activities have a negative effect on plant and animal species. Some people think that it is too late to do anything. Some people think that we should take effective action to improve situation. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Human activities have a negative effect on plant and animal species. Some people think that it is too late to do anything. Some other people believe that we should take effective action to improve the situation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are various reasons leading to the vulnerability of wildlife, including human activities. While some people argue that nothing can be done to take back what is already gone, others reject this notion, believing that we should take effectual action to protect our ecological system. In this essay, I shall examine the merits of both sides of the argument and state my own opinion.
On the one hand, there are many reasons which make a lot of people think that it is too late to take action on environmental contamination. One of the most undeniable reasons is the extinction of many living creatures. The giant panda, for example, witnessed a significant decline in its population, and completely died out a few years ago as a consequence of habitat destruction caused by human beings. Another flexible factor is the speed of reduction is too fast, while it takes a long time maybe even 50 to 100 years to recover the natural environment which had been destroyed by its own people. For instance, in 1998 according to A.N.T, 10 % corals had disappeared, and this figure will rise to 98% in 2050. This has led to a terrible ecological crisis, making various marine animals to the brink of extinction. This fundamentally, is why people feel hopeless to protect our wildlife.
On the other hand, many people still believe that just a little effort will improve the situation. For example, many species are on the rise again, thanks to the non-stop attempts of organizations which were found aiming to protect wild organisms. Besides, many governments have increased public awareness of illegal wild animals products with the hope that numbers of animals are killed will reduce. Also, individuals can assist in the effort to alleviate problems in local communities by donating to foundations which care for orphaned and injured wildlife or supporting high-profile campaigns to stop demand. All these efforts are hopeful, so I think people should do whatever they can, for our planet's future.
All things considered, I am convinced that although many consequences of our detrimental activities to other species had happened, there are a lot of activities that people can do to save our planet.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-04-17 | JuliaWanderst | 84 | view |
- Many young people believe that it is important to buy expensive fashionable clothes for school or going out Others believe that parents should take more control on how their children spend their money 38
- Saving is better than spending. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Most countries want to improve the standard of living through economic development, however, others think the social value is lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 640, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: T
... For instance, in 1998 according to A.N.T, 10 % corals had disappeared, and this ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, so, still, while, for example, for instance, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05665024631 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78111840582 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559113300493 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0495837397 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.65 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397923937659 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125907944627 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145695941824 0.0667982634062 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27483173204 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.309076003712 0.056905535591 543% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.