One of the most conspicuous trend of today's world is a colossal upsurge in number of people believing that the outcomes of raising production of consumer goods is effecting the natural habitat. There are wide range of reason that why it is happening. In this essay, i will discuss issues of increasing production and give some appropriate solutions in following paragraph.
To commence with, there are deluges of arguments for soaring concerns of damage of environment by increasing production of costumer goods. The most preponderant one is that increasing demand of raw material. To elaborate it, to product good at high quantity the large number of raw material will be used which get from natural things such as trees are needed to product paper those protect from air pollution. It can not only contribute to globe warming. but also lead to numerous other pitfalls to earth. Another cause of producing goods is that use of chemical is increasing. This is because, for making any type of product the industry use to chemical which added into water bodies or in air and pollute environment. Needless to say, all these demerits stand in negative stead.
Steps to deal with this problem are many. The most effective ones are not remote and complicated but practicable and accessible. The primary one lies in this facts that limit the product of production because when limited number of product will be manufacture of goods than use of raw material will also decreased. And government should implement rule not to use high toxic products to individual by which chemical should not effect the environment. This will only provide positive result to society when all contribute together.
To conclude, having pondered over above stated it is crystal clear that to protect environment for damaging that cause by increasing the production of consumer goods will be overcome by taking effective measures towards them.
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 73
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period
- Writing task 1 The Car Ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 78
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...hat why it is happening. In this essay, i will discuss issues of increasing produ...
^
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...n not only contribute to globe warming. but also lead to numerous other pitfalls to...
^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...and accessible. The primary one lies in this facts that limit the product of product...
^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'decrease'
Suggestion: decrease
...oods than use of raw material will also decreased. And government should implement rule n...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...individual by which chemical should not effect the environment. This will only provide...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10191082803 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71692450575 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557324840764 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1040370637 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2352941176 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.29411764706 7.06120827912 18% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271326574626 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716290785074 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736459231369 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179266277021 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545258159198 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.