Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution To what extend do you agree or disagree What other measure do you think might be effective

In modern life, air pollution and traffic are enormous problems. People and governments want to solve this problem. Some critics believe go up the price of petrol can solve these problems. This essay will examine this method and suggest another way to solve these problems.
Evidence suggests, increasing the price of petrol can less pollution and traffic. Because if people don’t have enough money, they use public transports instead of their cars. But some people don’t care about money. They use cars more and more. That solution will give a short term impact.
From my point of view, the government and people should help each other. For example, the government decreases the price of bicycles so people use bicycles instead of vehicles that use fossil fuel.
Another solution is that people go to work by train or subways. That is fast and the traffic will be low.
The government should be attention to product electric cars and support the faculty and to persuasion the people to purchase electric cars.
Overall, considering the points discussed above, all of the people in the world should help to solve that problem and increasing the price of petrol is not the best way.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
... will be low. The government should be attention to product electric cars and support th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 50, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...considering the points discussed above, all of the people in the world should help to solv...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 1615.20841683 62% => OK
No of words: 199.0 315.596192385 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04522613065 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33839565515 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 176.041082164 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557788944724 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 506.74238477 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3744127715 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.9333333333 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2666666667 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6 7.06120827912 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141680858358 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516494512916 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573536523884 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749773810365 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458358493325 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.12 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 9.78957915832 41% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.