In this pace of life, human being have been forgotten towards their original task "save the earth". To rising the cost of fuel is the extra ordinary method to mitigate the issue of traffic congestion as well as pollution conflict . I firmly discord consummate to the writer notion and reason of my inclination are articulated in the upcoming paragraph.
The predominant justification to support my ideology is that the vehicle is the most Paramount mode to relocate us by one place to another area therefore, whether the price of petrol will likely to rise or not, no matter owing to this is reasonable to the extent that millions of people worldwide have to deal with there own vehicle and fill out the petrol in terms of there work purpose. Considering Further, instead of rising up the amount of fuel administrative ought to introduce new policy such as, eco-friendly cars and bike in order to travel. As a result, the rate of pollution will likely to deteriorate in the future. For instance, in New Zealand, appropriate more than 50% of citizen is using electric vehicle to protect the nature.
Moreover, to soothe the traffic hurdle One should adhere all the rules and regulation which had been declared by regulatory bodies. To explicate, whenever any person travel outside from they home by any vehicle they should follow rules to destroy the chain of traffic rather than inclining the cost of fuel. To epitome, in Canada, the rate of fuel is minimal du to the fact that every citizen is following every rules so, government would not got any chance to rise the price of fuel.
In conclusion, although in order to save the nature and maintain the traffic woe is a crucial one, yet to increase the price of petrol is not an appropriate way because in this contemporary era, not all the people is richer and it can impact on them regular life, who are deprived.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 84
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays children watch a lot of TV and play video games However some people think that activities are not good for a child s mental health To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e issue of traffic congestion as well as pollution conflict . I firmly discord co...
^^
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ongestion as well as pollution conflict . I firmly discord consummate to the writ...
^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: THERE_OWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their own'?
Suggestion: their own
...s of people worldwide have to deal with there own vehicle and fill out the petrol in term...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e ought to introduce new policy such as, eco-friendly cars and bike in order to t...
^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...ng every rules so, government would not got any chance to rise the price of fuel. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66272510966 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581538461538 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.8194337351 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.818181818 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5454545455 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0851830006678 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286945348847 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266017311951 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0526060588474 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218784287787 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.