International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
Around the world, tourism industry is proving beneficial for different places by not only generating good revenue but also creating employment opportunities. However, there are some possible drawbacks of international tourism as it has negative effects on local inhabitants and the environment. Nonetheless, I firmly believe that if both pros and cons are considered the merits of tourism surpass the demerits.
On the one hand, international tourism is advantageous in many ways. Firstly, it contributes towards revenue generation for the country. In addition, it plays a significant role in creating employment prospects for local people. For instance, a country like Dubai has oil industry for generating income but apart from that there is no other source of income generation. However, a large number of tourists visits Dubai, thanks to Dubai's world class tourist attraction. Secondly, to accommodate international tourists many local people do jobs in different companies which facilitates the tourists. Hence, the local people and the Government in the tourist places are benefited by the tourism.
On the other hand, despite many advantages of international tourism there are some disadvantages too. It affects local inhabitants as well as the environment because to make the place more alluring to tourists the natural surroundings are modified which eventually damages the nature. Moreover, it also destroys the habitat of local animals. As many people are dependent on the tourism business, there are times when tourists are not visiting and the local people find difficulty in earning money for living then.
In conclusion, international tourism has its positive and negative impact but the merits like more income and employment overshadow the demerits.
- The diagrams below give information about two road tunnels in two Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Childhood obesity has become a serious problem in recent years What are the primary cause of this What measures should be taken to reduce childhood obesity 56
- 14 2 2019 and 20 8 2022 The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- Some people claim that public museums and art allergies will not be needed because people can see historical objects and worksk of art using a computer To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- 29 5 2021 Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shops and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... proving beneficial for different places by not only generating good revenue but ...
^^
Line 2, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ole in creating employment prospects for local people. For instance, a country li...
^^
Line 2, column 380, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...r source of income generation. However, a large number of tourists visits Dubai, thanks to Dubais...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, well, apart from, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57992565056 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02919921284 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542750929368 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4280940234 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.066666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4666666667 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327865080129 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117872700181 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962284051774 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207418113946 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349509181166 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.