International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is argued that tourism industry accompanies by both beneficial and harmful effects on the tourist destinations. While I understand the negative impacts, I believe the plus side of the industry certainly supersedes the negative impacts.
On the one hand, anti-tourists industry offer varieties of reasons from cultural, economic, political and environmental aspects. Firstly, the opponents believe since visitors typically are from more developed countries, their cultural values are admired and likely to be copied by the local people especially the youths. This may lead to disappearance of local traditions and customs in the long run or disintegration of social fabric of the local people which may cause instability and political unrest later. Secondly, the visitors litter in the environment which will pollute the local habitats nevertheless it is the local people who suffer from the pollution. Thirdly, the arrival of visitors increases the prices of food and home in the local area during the high seasons because the service providers tend to offer the resources to affluent customers which will deprive the local people from having their normal life.
On the other hand, tourists spend more money than the local which encourages entrepreneurs to create more job opportunities which is in benefits of the locals this will boost the life perspective in poorer places and possibly discourages emigrations besides improving the life quality of the local in the long terms. In addition to that, the cultural interaction in not just negative, but it can also generate a melting pot of cultural values and fortify the local culture though increasing the sense of unity and may provide a harmonious life in the future.
In conclusion, I believe tourism industry is far more beneficiary than harmful and has the potential to improve the local lives while the negative influence is negligible.
- Light pollution excessive light during night time is a form of pollution that distresses many people especially in modern cities What are the causes of light pollution and what solutions can you suggest for governments and businesses to take 65
- Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic social and commercial perspectives What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures 84
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 84
- For career development people are required to learn and apply various types of skills at work While speaking in public is an important talent it cannot be accounted as the most significant feature 89
- In recent years more and more people tend to live individualy What are the causes of this trend Does this have a positive or negative effect on society 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87918777127 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553333333333 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.4951998157 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.3 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.9 7.06120827912 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0943449242165 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401336070005 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.024421012979 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0576861815674 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132953698036 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.