Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is advocated by the majority that accessibility to the Internet has granted the youth superb opportunity in fulfilling their working and studying goals. From my personal perspective, I partly take side with this viewpoint as the Internet can be a double-edge sword to the young generation.
It is undeniable that the proliferation of Internet and online platforms has given people unlimited access to the massive source of information available online. To be more specific, a variety of materials can be found on online-sharing websites, ranging from academic research to primary lesson instructions, this has offer great assistance to not only researchers and workers but also students. To cite an example, secondary students can actively prepare for their upcoming class by watching instruction videos on Youtube or they can enhance their knowledge by engaging in online classes with qualified teachers.
On the flip side, notwithstanding the unrivalled role of Internet in our daily life, it is worth mentioned that should it is used without strict supervision, dire consequences will come sooner or later. First and foremost, the highly-addictive feature of Internet has driven lots of people to the verge of ignoring their daily tasks. Supposing workers spend hours with their eyes glued to the screen playing games, the efficiency and quality of work will definitely decline, as a result, they may be fired due to their low productivity. Secondly, information that are available on websites may not be checked and censored prior to posting. Consequently, some misleading information may be absorb by the youth, which is detrimental for them in the long term.
In the nut shell, despite all of the benefits that we can reap from using the Internet, the youth should always be careful when using it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 92 | view |
| 2023-04-24 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers Some disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city London and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 67
- In many countries plastic containers have become more popular than ever They are used in many businesses for example food and drink industries Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ong term. In the nut shell, despite all of the benefits that we can reap from using th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29065743945 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03443044182 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622837370242 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.9935059915 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143853366551 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555323559275 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430821302082 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847728405416 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381999286801 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.