Nowadays, punishment is a big question for all parents and teachers. Some people believe that it is crucial to teach the difference between what is wrong and what is right for children at the initial period of life. They think the punishment is necessary to help them understand this difference. This essay will discuss why penalization is not good for children and some punishments which are given by teachers and parents to teach appropriate behaviour.
If children do anything wrong then parents penalize them, it will affect their behaviour. Moreover, children might become stubborn and they will not listen to their parents. For example, whenever my brother is punished then they do not behave appropriately with anyone. However, parents should maintain a friendly environment with their kids. As a result, children will talk about their studies and thoughts to their parents. In short, punishment leads to negative impacts on their behaviour.
There are lots of physical punishments which are affected physical injuries as well as mental health problems for children. In addition, they will become aggressive. For instance, when parents hit the children then they might get angry and depress. They feel alone and suffer from anxiety. Overall, because of injuries and mental health issues, punishment is not a good way to teach the distinction between right and wrong.
There are plenty of punishments that will help children in the future. Parents should set daily limits on using phones. Teachers should also give punishments like give more homework.
It is increasingly likely that punishment is not the only choice to teach students the right thing. However, there are many other ways to teach them. Ultimately, teachers and parents will make a huge impact on children's behaviour.
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively larger number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 56
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comaparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comaparisons where relevant 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in short, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3006993007 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65423999952 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527972027972 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9023453243 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.1904761905 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.619047619 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.9879759519 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319122214183 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955917870823 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664259654396 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181156015992 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925516137564 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in short, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3006993007 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65423999952 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527972027972 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9023453243 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.1904761905 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.619047619 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.9879759519 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319122214183 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955917870823 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664259654396 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181156015992 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925516137564 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.