It is essential to distinguish right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this differentiation. In my opinion, punishment is only a tool to educate pupils. Some extend I support to punishment as an initiative but punishment should not hurt children's feelings and honour. If parents or teachers do not consider this, that may have resulted in loose children's self-respect. As a general, we want to well-educated people not well trained. We should see them as an individual person.
I was sometimes grounded by my parent for several reasons. My parents' logic was to have been done mandatory works which belonged to me. This may be stemmed from the take responsibility, I do not know whether or not. Generally, I did not go outside without completing my homework and other responsibilities. Sometimes punishments were harsh for me, but now I know my general responsibilities.
As I believe punishment as a route to educate people and I also think that the reward system too. Because I have been punished for my wrong behaviours, I also have been rewarded by my parents when I displayed good behaviours. The balance between them should be justice. And being justice was not easy for my parents because they always overrated the situations. At that point, my teachers had invertations and they said my power and weakness.
In the beginning, I defended the punishment but now I want to introduce an important point. The point is personal differences. Some people may not be offended by a punishment, like me, but others may shrink back into their shell. Parents and teacher could not see the advantage. At this point, I correct my defence that parents and teacher both should consider the children's preferences and they should this cooperatively. When they understand punishment is a useful tool or not for educational proposes, both of them should stick to the rules. Otherwise, children may be confused.
- The bar chart shows the highest qualification attained by sex for the working age population in Wales in 2001 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 42
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 61
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors-agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services-to the UK economy in the twentieth century.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparison 78
- You have seen an advertisement for a weekend job as a local tour guide showing visitors around your city.Write a letter of application to the tourism office. In the letter-Give your reasons for wanting the job-Explain why you think you can do the job-Desc 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
... is only a tool to educate pupils. Some extend I support to punishment as an initiativ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 200, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... the take responsibility, I do not know whether or not. Generally, I did not go outside withou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, as to, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99380804954 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11085279816 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523219814241 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9596222735 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.2083333333 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4583333333 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.08333333333 7.06120827912 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307764902685 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932198832483 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883360434874 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199663070672 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126500876427 0.056905535591 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.