It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There has always been a debate that whether students should be encouraged to focus more on local history or world history. From a personal perspective, I believe both local history and world history hold a solid position in childern's education.
It is undeniable that local history contribution in a child tutelage. It teaches children about regional culture and politics, which makes them proud and appreciate their ancestor subscription in building, protecting and developing their nation. Moreover, children can learn about the mistakes have been made in the past and avoid doing the same thing all over again. In addition, learning about local history motivate children carry out traditional customs.
Additionally, children can benefit from learning the world history. To make sense of local history, children have to learn about world history since history is a series of events. For example, the reason Vietnam regained its independence from Japan was because Japan surrender to the Allies. Furthermore, learning about the world history broaden our knowledge and gives us a mutual understanding for other nations or traditions, which provide opportunities to make friends, communicate, study, work abroad or even migrate to another country.
For above reason, children should both be educated regional and world history.
- Children should always follow their parents advice to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Most of the urgent problems can only be solved through international cooperation. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some British families decide not to buy televisions because they influence the development of the creativity of children. What do you think? 78
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 22
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, so, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 203.0 315.596192385 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5960591133 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78861247453 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.366590002 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.272727273 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320313965674 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133176455678 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675565163478 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191817590187 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485999780129 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.