It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (E.g: Dinosaurs, dodos,…). There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
There is an increasingly growing popular idea the depletion of any natural creatures can not precluded due to the theoretical framework of natural process. I, however firmly believe that it is not the natural process triggering this extinction and this essay will tackle the most important reasons why.
This is primarily due to the fact that in acient period, the residents were not aware of the creatures’ disappearance, which caused by their high demands and consumptions. Neither lack of concern, nor cutting-edge technology or a specific plans for a large-scale conservation in the primitive period of human species did they have, human continue paying heed to produce and manufacture for individual merits. To shed light on this issue, a tortoise species has died out on the grounds of being hunted for food and oil by the emigrants and pirates, which is considered as a significant damage to the habitat.
On the other hand, it is worth noting that some predators are deleterious to human that the preservation is not taken into account. It is observable that these omnivore animals pose a threat to agricultural development and even other harmless creatures, leading to their depletions due to being a natural enemy. For instance, in Amazone tropical forest, only after a nocturnal venomous snake species appears do a number of some herbivores drastically plunge.
Granted, there is no denying that some creatures such as dinosaurs in the prehistorical periods were extincted due to the external influences. Still, I would like to emphasize that the majority of animals dying out is severely affected by human activities.
To conclude, it is the low technology and awareness of inhabitants driving to the rapid deterioration of fauna. Therefore, it is highly recommended that there has to be some viable solutions to this alarming issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-22 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 80 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | tienallen' | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | tienallen' | 67 | view |
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 91
- The percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in 4 countries in 1970 and 2000 78
- Percentage of pupils who passed their final exams 1993 11
- Percentage of pupils who passed their final exams 1993 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'preclude'
Suggestion: preclude
...letion of any natural creatures can not precluded due to the theoretical framework of nat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'significant damage'.
Suggestion: significant damage
...nts and pirates, which is considered as a significant damage to the habitat. On the other hand, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, therefore, as to, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26174496644 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02754497197 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604026845638 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2610908172 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.666666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186171544244 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591611891984 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046697192399 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915987121506 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485318056332 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.