Large shopping malls are replacing small shops Do you think it is a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

It is suggested by many that traditional businesses should be replaced by mega shopping centres. In my opinion, the benefits of large shopping malls outweigh its drawbacks.

On the one hand, the existence of big shopping malls has some negative effects on small shops. As more people opt to shop at supermarkets, local businesses suffer loss and eventually shut down. Moreover, parking problems could be a substantial reason behind the opponent’s viewpoint. There including excursive crowding in the shopping complex, especially one weekend and holidays. As a result, shoppers have to spend a long time in the parking bays rather than shopping in small shops. The prices in large shopping malls are also unreasonable and people always end up purchasing more than they actually need. Therefore, shopping at large centres might not be convenient for the lower and middle-class population.

On the other hand, the reasons for supermarkets becoming popular are manifold. Firstly, mega shopping complexes bring difficult vendors under a single roof and offer a spectrum of products. As people in cities have less time to spend on shopping, these malls save their valuable time. Consequently, they do not have to make multiple stops at different stores to get take shopping for a more comfortable and exciting experience. Thus, peeling more and more customers and multiplying the business.

In conclusion, the number of mega malls is increasing these days, and some people believe that they will replace traditional markets. I personally believe that supermarkets have immense benefits to the modern society that outweigh the options and conveniences offered by the small shops.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-16 linh allie 84 view
2024-11-16 linh allie 84 view
2024-11-16 linh allie 84 view
2024-11-13 vidung 61 view
2024-11-11 vuhongminh 61 view
Essays by user haphuongpham49 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4030418251 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88196373814 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593155893536 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9972824482 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8125 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309166950715 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981932411743 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738690736975 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183619550888 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905663868143 0.056905535591 159% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.