Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

It is true that, in this contemporary era, new informations are being taken by people but it does not mean that we would not gain any knowledge about our past. According to my perspective, learning or attaining some knowledge from our past events it is essential for us.

To start with, there are few points that why past values are necessary for us. Firstly, when we identify that we are totally wrong in this point in our past so definately we would improve ourselves in our present as well as future. Secondly, learning about histories of our country's as well as past culture it gives us satisfaction. Thirdly, we know that all things are done by our freedom fighters. We should know about them.
For example, first I had got only 4.5 bands in my writing but after that I started working hard on my writing skills and taken some experience from my past. In addition, that is why right now I am able to write anything without any single mistake.

Looking at the other view, we have lots of different knowledge and all things for learning. Furthermore, time is given my people for acquiring new learning and know about different technologies. It may be not good for learning about past in this modern era. For instance, when people would go for interview at that time companies would ask all the things related to current situations rather than past.

On a concluding note, undoubtedly present knowledge is also important for all people yet, we must understand that learning from past would always beneficial for us. We do not think to do our past mistake in our present and we should take some knowledge about past as well. Past values are more essential than anything.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, it is true, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72108843537 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56258602724 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527210884354 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1574719826 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.75 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210601995125 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885120410554 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572538093324 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131751723764 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617154825725 0.056905535591 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.