It is true that, people living in skyscrapers are escalating rapidly in many cities and it is often discussed that whether it is good or bad. Co housing like apartment blocks helps people became more inter personally connected and limit the building congestion in cities, which is overlapping con's like privacy issues and neatness.
Shared house in flats makes unity than solitary storey's. They would get chance to mingle each other, conduct programms, enjoy cooking and many other ways to engage their tedious free hours. Whereas, in single houses might have less access to co ordinate such programs and somehow they could not interest to participate activities like these. Moreover, congested buildings and crowded atmosphere has been a critical problem . People who got a chance to live such apartment wings helps the society from free of that issues. For instance, Big companies give hostel facility to the employees in a same apartment rather than single one floor houses, which wound flourish bonding and avoid massive congestion in some extent.
Nevertheless, mainly, lack of privacy makes problems in building flats related to the noise and lack of relaxation areas. For example, People mainly complained in flat house that less availability to sit and walk or practicing hobbies like any musical instruments. Although, that would make another house member to be annoy, irrespective of such issues makes that would be a platform to someone join in same interest. Secondly disadvantage of co housing is related to the disposal of garbage many argues. In brief, people from different attitudes some times throw waste unattentively, make the floor dirty. While, proper management can surpass these problems to the core.
In conclusion, despite many argues against co housing in same building blocks, explained facts would overcome the predominant benefits of shared houses in same apartments.
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of areas such as fashion and consumer goods To what extent do you agree 54
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Many experts want to ban media or to seize their sovereignty. Why? Explain reasons and solutions. 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology canreplace their functions.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re escalating rapidly in many cities and it is often discussed that whether it is...
^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d atmosphere has been a critical problem . People who got a chance to live such ap...
^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d lack of relaxation areas. For example, People mainly complained in flat house t...
^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'joins'.
Suggestion: joins
...kes that would be a platform to someone join in same interest. Secondly disadvantage...
^^^^
Line 5, column 609, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...te unattentively, make the floor dirty. While, proper management can surpass these pr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in brief, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65182466197 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626666666667 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1123365404 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.066666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129279583133 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422285901053 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449842307479 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838225050539 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432171428576 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.