While money charging is the classical ritual for the museums, it is often seen that some museums change the admission rules to entirely free entry now. I strongly believe that the advantages of the admission price are absolutely not outweighing the disadvantages. While some supporters may think that a suitable admission price is critical as far as controlling the visitor numbers on the museums, the most important thing is that increases the attraction of the museums. A local example of this idea would be the fact that the population of the Hong Kong museums is low as well as no one interest to entry as the exhibits as well as the entry prices are not attractive for the people. Hence, it is critical to exclude the admission price as far as improve the attraction of the museums in order to rise the population of the museums’ visitors. Likewise, there are several reasons why I believe that the negative consequences are much more than the positive consequences of the admission charge. In Hong Kong, the history or cultural knowledge of the residents is lacked since the approach is not enough for them. Also, museums are a feasible way to expand their learning about history as well as cultural knowledge. Therefore, as long as the admission price of the museums can be abolished, the variety acknowledges of the city or others would be rose for the inhabitants or even tourists by the free participation in the museums. In conclusion, I believe that the admission price of the museums is not a proper policy, and there are various positive effects for free entry.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 56
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choice on everyday matters (such as food, cloths and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is importa 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- the charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008. summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who are five portions of fruits and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, likewise, may, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95131086142 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14217254893 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49063670412 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.2975951904 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.6562781808 49.4020404114 200% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.857142857 106.682146367 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.1428571429 20.7667163134 184% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335805582238 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142979201853 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939570044545 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335805582238 0.151304729494 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.1190380762 170% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.