While money charging is the classical ritual for the museums, it is often seen that some museums change the admission rules to entirely free entry now. I strongly believe that the advantages of the admission price are absolutely not outweighing the disadvantages.
Although some supporters may think that a suitable admission price is critical as far as controlling the visitor numbers on the museums, the most important thing is that increases the attraction of the museums. A local example of this idea would be the fact that the population of the Hong Kong museums is low as well as no one interest to entry as the exhibits as well as the entry prices are not attractive for the people. Hence, it is critical to exclude the admission price as far as improve the attraction of the museums in order to rise the population of the museums’ visitors.
Likewise, there are several reasons why I believe that the negatives are much more than the positives of the admission charge. In Hong Kong, the history or cultural knowledge of the residents is lacked since the approach is not enough for them, in this circumstance, museums are a feasible way to improve their learning about history as well as cultural knowledge. Therefore, as long as the admission price of the museums can be abolished, the variety acknowledges of the city or others would be rose for the inhabitants or even tourists by the free participation in the museums.
In conclusion, I believe that the admission price of the museums is not a proper policy, also, there are various positive effects for free entry.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 61
- The maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 84
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utely not outweighing the disadvantages. Although some supporters may think that ...
^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y the free participation in the museums. In conclusion, I believe that the admiss...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, likewise, may, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91111111111 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90351473308 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.2975951904 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.0979260037 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 189.428571429 106.682146367 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.5714285714 20.7667163134 186% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326988570315 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14317413338 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882123095769 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21997660531 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866892761282 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.1190380762 170% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.