Nowadays, Museums are incredibly dynamic actors that work to contribute to positive societal development. Some people, including me, believe that the entrance fee for the museum carries more weight than being free. In this essay, the positive points of this argument will be discussed.
Firstly, it is the famous slogan that more budget brings more profit. Therefore, it is inevitable that for having a qualified museum, spending money is one of the necessities and one suitable way that makes this possible would be the entrance fee. In some countries, museums play an important rule with regard to attracting tourists so the outstanding museum could be a key pivot for improving the economic system.
Secondly, because of the importance of transferring culture, the museum has a paramount placement. Therefore, it is the curators’ responsibility to supports heritage and the arts with its entire product portfolio, and it would be more convenient with the security system. As a result, charging for admission not only prepares an opportunity to improve the quality of museums but also force visitors to be committed while facing with priceless objects. If museums were free publicity, many objects might be stolen because of poor security which would be better with a more acceptable budget.
In conclusion, I firmly agree that the merit of admission fee for museum is more than its drawback. Because this plan has a long perspective due to boosting tourism industry and protecting museums’ objects.
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree? 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 65
- It is difficult for people in the cities to get enough physical exercise. What are the causes and solution? 78
- As the number of private cars has increased so too has the level of pollution in many cities What can be done to tackle this increasingly common problem 86
- Some people believe that we have too many choices these days. To what extent to you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32083333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90341932039 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608333333333 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3956956194 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.416666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200472469925 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790116438705 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660199439226 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132364941017 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124048973545 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.