More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development

In recent years, sharing personal information on the internet has become increasingly popular for various activities, including online conversations and banking. While there are several benefits to revealing this information online, including inconvenience and time efficiency, I still believe that it might put individuals at risk of cyber-crimes.
On the one hand, putting your information online can enhance a superior user's experience in the following aspects. Chief of these is that users filling out all their information during the first registration stage can download various kinds of materials, allowing them to skip the time-consuming entry and transfer immediately to the final stage. For example, by providing personal details about name, address, and occupations on educational platforms such as Hocmai.com or study4.com when creating an account, individuals can log in to any lessons and materials quickly. The synchronization of private information and exclusive accounts allows e-commerce shoppers to place orders in minutes, saving them time while other online customers must fill out full details each time they order.
On the other hand, sharing private details online can make users vulnerable to cybercrimes. More specifically, private information posted online including one’s name, address, and email can be easily exploited and sold to fraud organizations for illegal purposes. In reality, cybercriminals often use phishing scams to steal personal information, such as by sending an email requesting updates on bank account information. For example, by clicking on the link in the mail and providing personal details, cybercriminals can access bank details, leading to unauthorized transactions or even identity theft. As a result, victims may also suffer financial losses and credit damage.
In conclusion, although posting private information on the Internet can give users a convenient experience and save time, I still contend that this might make individuals susceptible to criminal activities. I am also convinced that internet users should choose reliable websites and be careful about providing their private information on platforms for personal purposes.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83800623053 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14425760977 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595015576324 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6340835659 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.153846154 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184425443411 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676322336279 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341420279978 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116893111526 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166944848659 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.