most people accept that we now live in a globalised world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial.to what extent is globalisation a positive or negative development?

Globalization of the world has turned out to be a fruitful venture. Many people are undermining this phenomenon and not able to realize the benefits it has when it comes to socio-economic and political aspects of a nation.

To embark upon, technological advancements are the support system of the present global and connected world. As a matter of fact, technology has enabled individuals who are distant apart to connect with each other and share the ideas and knowledge. Furthermore, this linkage has enriched both the parties by understanding and adopting the best practices followed in the alien country, all this being done from a remote location. The purpose of globalization is to nurture the mankind with an able aid given by technology. To illustrate, children in China are learning English from teachers in United States via virtual classrooms. The teachers are gaining in financial terms and students in terms of language ability.

In continuity to above, even the governments are reaping the fruits of globalization. For example, India took help from London to implement a public transport like tube. The metro trains in India have decongested the roads and provided people with a reliable and swift public transport system.

In contrast to viewpoints presented above, globalization has opened the world and made countries porus when it comes to preserving national security. There are some rogue groups around the world who are misusing this linkage to their own benefits by terrorizing the nations. Moreover, in some cases this results in the breakage of trust between the two nations due to the misunderstanding created by malicious groups.

To recapitulate, globalization is advantageous for any community around the world and indulgence in it will have long term positive effects.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'public transport'.
Suggestion: public transport
...ndia took help from London to implement a public transport like tube. The metro trains in India ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 119, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...rld and indulgence in it will have long term positive effects.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, for example, in contrast, as a matter of fact, in contrast to, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32867132867 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05241350841 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597902097902 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9295974756 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0886256506676 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268560363386 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242344239543 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0511499141329 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210900471665 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.