These days, the way many folks communicate with each other has altered because of technology. My view is that overall modern technology improves interaction in personal relationships. This essay will support my opinion with relevant examples.
It is clear that technology has transformed the way people communicate in numerous ways. Firstly, people are putting a top priority over phones and social networking sites to keep in touch with their friends and relatives instead of visiting in person. Since these types of applications are incredibly comfortable, conventional one on one meeting is increasingly obsolete. Secondly, email services like yahoo mail, Hotmail and Gmail have become more popular methods of interaction these days. In pre-digital times, when people would entirely depend on written letters, which were vulnerable and pricey, email however remains cost effective and instantaneous today.
I would firmly argue that these innovations have mostly improved personal relationships. Primarily, technology is helping to bridge the long distance relationships efficiently. For illustration, there is a high possibility that people will loose contact in absence of technology if they move to different cities or abroad. But owing to the technological advancement, strengthening the telescopic relationships is much easier. In addition, video calls and Skype, which generally mimic face to face communication, tend to bring people together. Next, communication is invariably possible among people on the spot. People do not have to wait for months to get a reply of letters of their loved ones. Indeed, they can have a pleasant conversation whenever they desire regardless of any physical barriers across the globe effortlessly.
In conclusion, technological based interaction is extremely worthwhile as it is convenient, cheap and prompt.
- The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand 76
- Many criminals re-offend after they have been punished. Why do some people continue to commit crimes after they have been punished, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 100
- Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 82
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job. On the other hand, other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 81
- The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000 with an estimate of the situation in 2050 Summarise the information 77
Essay evaluation report
people will loose contact in absence of technology
people will lose contact in absence of technology
Definitions of loose
adjective
not firmly or tightly fixed in place; detached or able to be detached.
a loose tooth
synonyms: not fixed in place, not secure, unsecured, unattached, detached, unfastened, untied, wobbly, unsteady, movable
(of a garment) not fitting tightly or closely.
she slipped into a loose T-shirt and shorts
synonyms: baggy, generously cut, slack, roomy, oversized, shapeless, sagging, saggy, sloppy, unwaisted
verb
set free; release.
the hounds have been loosed
----------------------
Definitions of lose
verb
be deprived of or cease to have or retain (something).
I've lost my appetite
synonyms: be deprived of, suffer the loss of, no longer have
become unable to find (something or someone).
I've lost the car keys
synonyms: mislay, misplace, be unable to find, lose track of, leave (behind), fail to keep/retain, fail to keep sight of
fail to win (a game or contest).
the Bears lost the final game of the series
synonyms: be defeated, be beaten, suffer defeat, be the loser, be conquered, be vanquished, be trounced, go down, take a licking, be bested
earn less (money) than one is spending or has spent.
the paper is losing $500,000 a month
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 275 350
No. of Characters: 1539 1500
No. of Different Words: 188 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.072 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.596 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.104 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 115 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.176 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.009 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.412 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.28 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.476 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.039 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... is a high possibility that people will loose contact in absence of technology if the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as it is convenient, cheap and prompt.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78181818182 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20510749423 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5181323377 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5294117647 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257713174416 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733784433711 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655464090013 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15151047273 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846547784617 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.