In recent years, there has been considerable discussion about what is the best way to expand people’s social circle. Some claim that the majority prefer to socialize online rather than meet with others in real life. In my opinion, this is a negative development which can lead to some dangerous situations and also embarrassing problems later in life.
One serious problem arising from people socializing online is that it can contribute to internet fraud. In the pre-Internet era, people who wanted to make more new friends had no choice but to meet others face to face. Due to the real interaction, people were more likely to detect others’ deception or ruses. Nevertheless, with the prevalence of the internet nowadays, people can conceal their genuine identities with ease and try to engage in something illegal online. For instance, some online fraudsters may assume a fake identity and use their “sweet” words to establish a relationship with people that do not stay alert. Then, they will ask those people for money, promising that they will pay it back soon; however, when they receive the money, they will immediately delete and block those gullible people from their friend’s list and continue looking for the next victim. Therefore, online socialization will not only increase the risk of suffering emotional betrayal but also incur a financial loss.
Another repercussion is the risks associated with social awkwardness. For example, young children are addicted to smartphones nowadays, so they spend a great deal of time chatting with their friends online using pictures and icons. It seems convenient to do so on the internet, but gradually, they will feel uncomfortable when they talk with others in real life. These uneasy feelings are due to the fact that they have been losing their communicative skills. As a result, they become shy and prone to stammer in the presence of other people, especially the opposite sex. Thus, online interaction will also produce more socially awkward introverts.
In conclusion, the negative impacts of socializing online far outweigh the benefits it can bring to people. Although it has brought much convenience to people’s daily life, it still has lots of problems that people need to deal with. Therefore, people should strike their balance between online interaction and face-to-face meeting.
- Some people like to spend their money as soon as they earn it while others think it is better to save their money for some time in the future Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 95
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles. 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement These days children spend more time on doing homework or participating in organized activities related to school or sports However they would be given more time to do whatever they want 90
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 90
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...e new friends had no choice but to meet others face to face. Due to the real interacti...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2625994695 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76010723057 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594164456233 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0492771263 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.421052632 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251989622546 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832790324726 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685684326851 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169816078124 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710267254202 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.