Our society saw a tremendously transformation between the past time and present. People depend on agriculture in the past centuries. However, people are more reliant on heavy industries and high technology industries over the recent years. Soaring advances of technology has penetrated into various aspect of human life. Cutting-edge development such as artificial intelligence is employed in driving cars. In the following paragraphs, I would elaborate on my opinion about the prompt.
Owing to the technological improvement, the accuracy of the artificial intelligence could decrease the happening of traffic accidents, which is beneficial to the society. This signifies that the program of the artificial intelligence could precisely calculate the car speeds and the adequate distance between the cars. A compelling example can be seen on the TV program called “National Geography”, showing that the car driven by artificial intelligence could effectively curtail the occurrence of accidents. As a result, the application of sophisticated technology exerts positive influence on the entire community.
Even though the development of artificial intelligence brings advantage for the entire society, I firmly believe that it is a negative development due to the fact that it would aggravate the unemployment rate of the human driver. Since more and more automobiles are driven by the artificial intelligence, less human are necessarily demanded. In this case, the artificial intelligence substantially occupies the job vacancies of the human driver. Furthermore, the uncertainty and instability remain exist in the artificial intelligence. There is little evidence to prove whether it is trustworthy and safe enough to be employed prevalently.
By way of conclusion, as argued above, the invention of artificial intelligence is surely prominent. Nevertheless, it is of vitally importance for the scientists to take cautious evaluation of its accuracy and safety.
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table shows the tourist numbers and tourist spending in five countries in 2012 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think the government should spend money on technology while the others think it should be for free education. Discuss both views and give your idea. 73
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('tremendously') instead an adjective, or a noun ('transformation') instead of another adjective.
Our society saw a tremendously transformation between the past time and present. Peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...tremendously transformation between the past time and present. People depend on agricultu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84482758621 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46957045524 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562068965517 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8965747262 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7058823529 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76470588235 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256299555619 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707476792353 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820429763867 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131167346601 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05691001845 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.