Nowadays, human life qualities are being enhanced and upgraded gradually in parallel with the emergence of innumerable various advertisements, by all means, that leads to a current tendency which people purchase unnecessary goods and expose of the old and out-of-date ones. Personally, I suppose this is a negative movement.
For starters, customers these days are prone to pay for needless things due to 2 main reasons. Firstly, our daily life aspects and standards have been being promoted briefly with higher income and demands. Therefore, most of them cannot ignore the temptation of new and advanced products which they think can polish their reputation to their relatives, their friends,… Secondly, another essential contributor to the former condition is the exaggeration of contemporary types of advertising. In order to survive in a severely competitive market, almost all corporations need to conduct marketing campaigns or launching products to generate revenue for their business. Undoubtedly, the customers will be targeted with appealing and satisfying promotions, with stunning and state-of-the-art commodities, and obviously, they will spend an enormous amount of money on these.
As a consequence of buying nonchalant kinds of stuff and substituting aged things, the human may have to build up a considerable number of garbage storing areas or these redundant things can be delivered to some developing countries. Thus the citizens of these developing will suffer from toxic elements that these long-established implements including. Besides, spending extra money on unneeded goods can also imbalance your expense management.
In conclusion, spenders are more inclined on paying for unessential products which are caused by the advancement of our life qualities and also due to a surge of modern competing kind of advertising. This condition results in clients’ money deficit, environmental pollution, and also human security.
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people think that the government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children while other think it is the fault of the parents Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010 67
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 366, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...tation to their relatives, their friends,… Secondly, another essential contributor...
^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...delivered to some developing countries. Thus the citizens of these developing will s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, briefly, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, i suppose, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71134020619 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19520371299 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646048109966 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.3577594397 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.094474234785 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272576282631 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363919848133 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0532196740245 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013909741508 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.