Nowadays, experience is more valued in the workplace than knowledge in many countries.
Today, experience in the workplace is becoming more favoured by many people over the real knowledge. While there many positive signs could be found, to my mind, the disadvantages of such a favour strongly outweigh the advantages.
To start with, for diverse employers, the work experience of possible employees increase the chances to hire them. Thus, company might be sure, that the revenue and success will come more quickly, which guarantee employees future career prospects. To give an example, If there are two candidates for one place, surely, the person from recruiting process will choose that one, who already have some working experience.
On the other hand, it clearly seems, that those people, who just graduated, will not get as soon as possible the job place, even wherever they have the highest results and grades. In many cases, while some people will definitely find a work place in their field, but with smaller salary, for other such situations can mean the lost interest and an unreached goal. As a result, a lot of companies already lost their potential.
Furthermore, we simply can not talk about experience and knowledge as different aspects, as they are like building and foundation, respectively. It seems that there is not necessity to hire one, who never heard about this kind of job and do not know what to do. In our days many graduated young people just can not achieve their aims, because they do not have experience. In addition, not all experience could be used for diverse types of job, to give an example, your previous occupation as a builder will not help to do your nursing better.
To sum up, all companies are deciding by their own, what is more valued - experience or knowledge, though, I feel that the choice should be given for all people, whereas they already worked or not. For nowadays, this is the most common problem, that is why more only graduated population can now find the job easier, that is, I believe, the right option.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | vidung | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-20 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-16 | Tuan Harry | 61 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England 78
- construct new buildings rather than wasting money on maintaining old ones 79
- household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia 78
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 (million). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 11
- the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts in 2012 with the predictions for 2030 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...avour strongly outweigh the advantages. To start with, for diverse employers, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o already have some working experience. On the other hand, it clearly seems, tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...companies already lost their potential. Furthermore, we simply can not talk abou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 544, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill not help to do your nursing better. To sum up, all companies are deciding by...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, thus, whereas, while, i feel, in addition, kind of, as a result, in many cases, to start with, to sum up, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93768545994 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53888218746 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581602373887 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7362357953 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163484037836 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056453578359 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644492413088 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934678342664 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601233577074 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.