In today's world, there is a widespread concern about an increased number of young people who have an essential part in the government. While some assert that it is advantageous, others oppose it. This essay will discuss the debate before reaching a logical conclusion.
On the one hand, supporters of young people point to youngers should lead the country by serving in decision-making positions. They say that young generations have innovative ideas and up-to-date knowledge which are believed can bring a change to the country. In addition, Another argument said that young employees have an understanding of the latest technologies, have the better global viewpoints, and free from corruptions. This means that making a good decision in terms of government sector relate to technology would be better if held by young executives that the aged ones.
On the other hand, opponents of young people claim that young employees often lack experiences and diplomatic perspectives to decide important decisions in sensitive areas, ranging from foreign affairs to budgeting in the country. That is the reason to not think that important positions for young people cannot be a good thing. Besides, other groups of people, such as older employees, would be suitable for the key positions. This is because of their extensive experiences and knowledge in considering a decision before applying that in public sectors.
In summary, it is logical to conclude that not only does an essential position in the government sectors need extensive experiences but should have a diplomatic view as well. As a result, I believe that young people should follow the older ones to learn more before making an important decision for the nation.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age group who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 73
- Some people say that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places or crowded areas, while others disagree. Discuss and give your own opinion. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, well, while, in addition, in summary, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26449275362 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8700844026 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2105071596 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.769230769 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229347741654 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083628539584 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782027461958 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139277117146 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404901871389 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.