In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport DISCUSS BOTH VIEW

Essay topics:

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION

PEOPLE TEND TO THINK DIFFERENT ON A SINGLE ISSUE AS SOME SUGGEST THAT STATE SHOULD CONSTRUCT NEW RAILWAY LINES WHILE OTHERS BELIVE IMPROVING THE PRESENT PUBLIC TRANSPORT SHOULD BE GIVEN PRIORITY. IN MY OPINION, BETTERMENT OF ALL TRANSPORT MODES NEED TO BE GIVEN MORE IMPORTANCE.
ON THE ONE HAND, MOST OF THE COUNTRIES SUFFER CRITICALLY DUE TO ITS OLD AND DILAPIDATED TRANSPORT SYSTEM, WHICH ARE INCONVENIENT FOR PEOPLE FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE. RESULTANTLY, MOST OF THE PEOPLE USE THEIR PRIVATE MEANS WITH A VIEW TO ACCOMPLISHING EVERYDAY TASKS SUCH AS GOING TO OFFICE, BRINGING CHILDREN TO SCHOOL AND SO ON. SUCH TYPE OF BEHAVIOR OBVIOUSLY CULMINATES GRIDLOCK ON THE ROAD, AND THIS CONGESTION IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT REASONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION. FOR EXAMPLE, IN DELHI, THE CAPITAL OF DHAKA, RESIDENTS USE PRIVATE CAR AS THE METROS ARE OUTDATED AND MOST IMPORTNALY IT DO NOT FOLLOW THE SCHEDULE STRICTLY. CONSEQUENTLY, IT IS THE MOST POLLUTED CITY NOT ONLY IN INDIA BUT ALSO IN ASIA. SO, CITY CORPORTATION ARE UNDERTAKING VARIOUS STANCES IN ORDER TO REJUVENATE THE TRAFFICE SYSTEM AS WELL AS THE TRANSPORT SECTOR SUCH AS BUS, TRAIN, AND WATER VASSEL.
ON THE OTHER HAND, MASS PEOPLE ARE ACCUSTOMED TO BOARDING A FAST TRAIN AS IT IS CONVENIENT, COST EFFECTIVE AS WELL AS SOOTING FOR ALL IRRESPECTIVE OF THEIR AGE GROUPS. NOT ONLY THAT, BULLET TRAIN CAN CARRY GOODS FROM ONE CITY TO ANOTHER AT LOWER COST. THAT’S WHY A GREAT NUMBER OF PEOPLE ARE INSISTING GOVERNMENT TO IMPLEMENT NEW RAIL LINES ALTHOUGH IT DISSUADES STATE FROM ELEVATING OTHER MEDIUM OF TRANSPORT. FOR EXAMPLE, DHAKA, A MEGACITY, IS CURRENTLY EXECUTING A FAST TRAIN PROJECT, WHICH WILL BE FIRST FOR THIS COUNTRY, AND IT WILL CONNECT DHAKA WIH NEARBY GAZIPUR CITY. BUT, EXPERTS ARE ADVISING PREMIER AS WELL AS THE PROJECT DIRECTORS TO DIVERT ITS FOCUS FROM THE CURRENT PROJECT TO UPLIFT THE WHOLE TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT.
IN CONCLUSION, IT IS IMPERATIVE FOR A COUNTRY TO PUT ITS PRIME FOCUS ON ALL TRANSPORT SECTORS AS SPENDING TOO MUCH ON NOTING BUT COMPRISING RAIL TRACKS WILL AFFECT IT ENORMOUSLY IN LONG RUN ALTHOUGH NEGLECTING THE LATTER WILL BE WORST.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-20 MinyiChu 67 view
2024-02-03 Wardiati Yusuf 61 view
2024-02-03 Wardiati Yusuf 61 view
2024-02-03 Wardiati Yusuf 67 view
2023-12-30 Tường Vân 73 view
Essays by user seamdu09 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: Does
...ROS ARE OUTDATED AND MOST IMPORTNALY IT DO NOT FOLLOW THE SCHEDULE STRICTLY. CONSE...
^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...GH NEGLECTING THE LATTER WILL BE WORST.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97765363128 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73968098093 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578212290503 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.0847056421 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.285714286 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25184697007 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077440209806 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724214542997 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149559160023 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735278158531 0.056905535591 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.