Nowadays, construction development played a huge role in Human's lifestyles. In a lot of nations, some individuals believe it is required to spend a large amount of money on building new railway lines for high-speed trains between two cities while others think the money should be spent on improving old public transport. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument in detail and provide evidence as to why improving existing public transport is superior.
Constructing new railway lines for very fast speed trains between cities will save the time of traveller. If people do travel in high-speed trains, they will reach their destination very quickly. For example, some businessmen do not have much time and they will get stuck in traffic. However, there is no traffic while travelling by trains. In short, because of the save travelling time that railway trains will get popular in the future.
Rebuilding or improving the existing public transport system is much less expensive than building new railway lines for high-speed trains. Moreover, in some old public transport does not need any improvement so it will save a rich source of money. For instance, constructing new railway lines for great-speed trains will need a lot of equipment than rebuilding old public transport. Overall, improving existing public transport is better because it is cost-saving.
It is increasingly likely that improving an existing public transport will help in many ways in order to spend money. However, there has been necessary to construct new railway trains which are having high-speed in between cities. Ultimately, there are plenty of cities where will need to rebuilding old public transport.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2962962963 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77346826199 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2561501112 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437141543528 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149448118013 0.084324248473 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121774234083 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291919571706 0.151304729494 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10715836662 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.